This is a good question because a lot of my clients are coming in and it’s pretty clear that the police stopped them for no reason.
Other than the fact they suspected they might be driving under the influence of alcohol and they wanted to be able to talk to them, smell their breath and get them to admit that they had some drinks, and then they could get them out and do the field sobriety tests, test their blood or breath and then arrest them for a DUI.
So, the very short and simple answer is, the police cannot just pull you over for any reason. They need some sort of a lawful reason to pull you over. Unfortunately, they do a lot of what we call boot strapping.
In other words, they pull you over illegally, get you for a DUI and then they boot strap and say listen, the guy was DUI, was swerving all over the road and that’s why I pulled him over. Of course, they’ve now got the information that your blood alcohol level was a .08 or greater. So, how do you combat that is the question.
The way that you combat is that fortunately, a lot of the police vehicles have what’s called Mbars in them. They’ve got recording devices. So, if they’re claiming that you made some illegal turn, some traffic violation or that you’re swerving all over the road, a lot of times we can pull the video and check to see if they’re really telling the truth.
If the Judge sees that they’ve lied about something related to the stop, a lot of times the Judge will decide that the stop was not lawful, and if the stop was not lawful, then anything that flows from the stop is going to have to be thrown out.
That would include your breath result, your blood result, all your field sobriety tests because they would’ve never been able to get you to do the field sobriety tests if they didn’t illegally pull you over; any statements that you make — so that pretty much ruins their case if the defense can prove that the stop was not a lawful stop.
So, what do they need in order to stop somebody? That’s the next question related to a DUI investigation. They’re going to need some sort of a traffic violation. That would give them the ability to stop you.
If they believe criminal activity is afoot, they can stop somebody, investigate, ask them questions and check it out. A lot of times, unfortunately, people are honest when the police ask them if they’ve had anything to drink and they admit it.
This is because maybe they’ve only had a couple of drinks and they don’t think that that’s going to be a problem, or maybe they’ve had more than a couple. They claim they’ve had a couple, and they think the police will just let them go.
What they don’t realize is the police have already targeted them. They believe that they are driving under the influence of alcohol. They’ve already decided they’re going to investigate him before they pull him over, because a lot of times they’re pulling people over on the weekends, late at night.
They figure most people who are out late at night on a Friday, Saturday, even a Sunday night are probably coming from a bar, a nightclub, a restaurant, have had some alcohol to drink and they’re now driving, so they’re looking to arrest that person.
That’s a sad state of affairs, but that’s the way that the police do it, so you have to bear that in mind before you go out for the night, that if you’re going to drink, you better figure out an exit strategy that doesn’t involve you putting yourself in jeopardy out on the road.
So, the bottom line is, the answer to the key question is the police cannot pull you over for any reason, but the issue for the defense is, can you prove that they didn’t pull you over for some lawful reason.
Certainly, the defendant can testify and say, I was driving fine. Everything was good. They just pulled me over for no reason. The police can then turn back and say, no, he was swerving and weaving and the reason he doesn’t know that he was doing that is because his blood alcohol level was over a .08, so he couldn’t safely operate a motor vehicle and he wouldn’t know that because alcohol has taken command of him.
So, that’s what you’re fighting against. There are situations where you can prove that the police pulled you over unlawfully and get the case thrown out, but you have to also realize the police know that so they’re writing their report in such a way that they’re trying to cover that argument by the defense attorney.
So, if you’ve got a situation where you think you were unlawfully pulled over, targeted, pick up the phone, make the call. I’ve been doing this for twenty-five years. I’ll be able to discuss it with you and give you a good feel for where the issues lie and what your chances are of winning a case by arguing that you were unlawfully pulled over.
Whether you have a good chance to win that and also, you should realize that when it comes to deciding whether you were lawfully pulled over, a jury does not decide that. A judge decides that. In a DUI case, a jury will only decide whether or not you were driving on the road and your blood alcohol level was a .08 or greater or you refused to take the test. That’s what the jury decides.
When it comes to search and seizure motions, illegal stop motions, those are all decided by a judge, so you can run your motion and win or lose. If you win, your case is over. If you lose, your case goes on and you’re entitled to have a jury trial or maybe you’ve resolved the case at that point because that was your one big issue in the case.
But no matter what, you have to have an attorney by your side because attorneys have handled these type of cases before. They’re able to neutrally look at the facts and give you a good feel whether you have a good argument to claim that the police illegally stopped you related to a DUI investigation and arrest.
Hedding Law Firm
16000 Ventura Blvd #1208
Encino, CA 91436