The Lawyers Other Lawyers Go To To Defend Them (213) 542-0963


What Happens at a DMV Hearing for a DUI Case?

Posted by Ronald D. Hedding | Oct 15, 2019 | 0 Comments

First off, the prosecutors at a DMV hearing are the hearing officers themselves.  So, non-lawyers are putting on the evidence for the Department of Motor Vehicles.  They have to put on the evidence and then they rule on all admission of evidence, including their own evidence.

So, they'll put on a police report, for example.  The defense attorney will object as hearsay since the police are not there to testify, they overrule the objection and put the police report into evidence anyways.

Subpoena Arresting Police Officer

If it's a close call on a case or if they have some problems on a case just based on the face of the police report, then what they will do is send a subpoena to the police officer who made the arrest for the DUI and that person will testify live on the phone.

First the DMV hearing officer will get to ask them questions and then the defense attorney can ask some questions and then in the end, the DV hearing officer will decide whether or not the person's license is suspended or the suspension is set aside.

I've almost never seen them make a decision right after the hearing.  Usually what they say is, thank you very much counsel.  We will let you know our decision shortly, and usually it's within a couple of days that the decision comes out.

Mandatory Actions Unit

If there are some real issues in the case and the hearing officer is confused and not sure how to rule, then they will send the case on to their mandatory actions unit and then it can take up to thirty, forty-five, sixty days in order for them to make a decision.  During that time frame, your client is certainly still allowed to drive.

DMV Hearing in Los Angeles DUI Cases

The client can drive as long as there is a stay in place until the DMV makes their final ruling regarding the suspension of the driver's license.  Really the three things that the DMV is looking at when deciding whether to suspend somebody's license are one, did the police legally stop the person.

In other words, was there some sort of a traffic violation?  Is there some sort of unlawful activity the police observed justifying a stop?  Or is it a DUI checkpoint, which is another way they can stop people without having probable cause.

If the stop is good, the next question is going to be, is the arrest lawful?  What makes a lawful arrest?  Well, obviously the police have to have probable cause to arrest the person.

That probable cause is usually gained through the person doing the field sobriety test and failing them.  Once a person fails a field sobriety tests, now the DMV feels justified in a DUI case in suspending the person's driver's license.

The next thing the DMV has to prove obviously is that the person's blood alcohol level was a .08 or greater and they can do that by way of a breath test.  They can do that by way of a blood test.

Also, another way to get you without even getting that resolved is if you're foolish enough to refuse to take the test, then it's automatically presumed that you're DUI.  You will lose your driver's license for one year with no restriction and it will make it a lot easier for the prosecutors to prove their case against you because there's a presumption that you were DUI.

The reason it's like that is because if they didn't do it that way then everybody would just refuse to take the test and then they would be in a position where they couldn't get anybody for a DUI.

So, based on that, they make sure that if you don't take the test, you're automatically a DUI unless you can rebut the presumption.  If you could prove somehow you weren't driving under the influence of alcohol which obviously is not an easy thing to do, then you would be in a position to rebut the presumption and you could get out of your DUI case.

DMV Hearing Is In Person or Over The Phone

These DMV hearings are usually conducted either in person or over the phone.  A lot of lawyers I hear claiming that they have a much better success rate if it's in person.  I totally disagree.  Either you have the evidence to beat the DMV or you don't.

You can beat them just as easily over the phone as you can in person.  I've won a lot of DMV hearings over the phone.  I don't really think it makes a difference in most cases whether the DMV hearing is conducted over the phone or in person.  If you've got the evidence, you've got the evidence.  If you don't, you don't.

So, if you've got a DUI and need some help with the DUI in the criminal court and with the DMV, pick up the phone.  Make the call.  We've been doing this for twenty-five years and handled thousands of DUI cases over the years and we'd be happy to help you get the best resolution for your DUI case.

About the Author

Ronald D. Hedding

What Makes Ronald Hedding Uniquely Qualified To Represent You? I've been practicing criminal defense for almost 30 years and have handled thousands of cases, including all types of state and federal sex crime cases. All consultations are discreet and confidential.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Comments have been disabled.

Contact Us Today

Hedding Law Firm is committed to answering your questions about DUI law issues in California and throughout the United States.

I'll privately discuss your case with you at your convenience. All consultations are free, discreet, and confidential. Contact us today to schedule an appointment.